L'ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DE L'INFANTERIE/ CANADIAN INFANTRY ASSOCIATION

 

Member of Conference of Defence Associations/Membre de Conférence des Associations de la Défense

Membres/Members (Registration is required.  You must be or have been a Canadian Infantryman to register. L'enregistrement est exigé. Vous devez être ou avoir été un soldat d'infanterie canadien à enregistrer.) (How to register)

Home
Archive
Assocation
Guestbook
Kit
Marches
Membres/Members

The Canadian Infantryman- Who they really are…. The best!

by Major-General (Retired) A.R. Forand, CMM, OStJ , SC , MSC, CD

Colonel Commandant, Canadian Infantry Branch

 

While I am no longer a serving officer in the Canadian Armed Forces (CF), I was recently appointed Colonel Commandant of the Infantry Branch. This honorary appointment allows me to visit our infantry battalions, regular and militia, and to offer advice to the leadership of the Army from the perspective of an old soldier who cares about the efficiency and well being of our front line combat troops. In view of recent events at home and abroad, I want to raise some serious issues that I feel must be redressed by our government.

 

The press coverage of the CF has increased since 9/11. This outrageous attack against the World Trade Center towers  demanded an immediate response to hold the perpetrators accountable. Canada’s decision to commit Third Battalion, Princess Patricia’s Canadian Light Infantry (3PPCLI) ( militia elements were included in the battle group) to participate in the US-led coalition operations in Afghanistan was welcomed by Canadians, even though it may have come as a shock to most.

 

Over the past decades, successive governments have lulled Canadians to view our military as neutral peacekeepers who will never be required to protect Canada in another war. The media has embraced and fostered this  false and idealistic image. I am concerned by the press tendancies to use politically correct soft language talking about “servicemen and wowen”, and constantly alluding to humanitarian aid and peacekeeping missions. This approach filters out some uncomfortable hard truths that are fundamental to telling the whole story about who in the army does what and how it gets done. Therefore, the implicit message to Canadians over the years has been that we do not require the CF to have a general-purpose combat capability – but  9/11 demonstrates that nothing could be further from reality. The whole of the Western world, including Canada , is  the object of  these attacks and we are committed whether we like it or not. It is the responsibility of  our government to take the necessary steps to counter terrorists in their homelands in order to protect our vital security interests in Canada , and internationally.

 

The media have focused attention on the soldiers of 3PPCLI. We have seen them in triumph and tragedy; representing our nation with grit and professionalism in the incredibly difficult operating conditions of Afghanistan .  Our government recently announced that we shall not replace 3 PPCLI when their tour of operational duty draws to a close. We have been told that the CF is over committed, undermanned and seriously lacking operational depth from which to task another uncommitted unit for duty in Afghanistan . And so Canada has decided to abandon our Allies, leaving the “heavy lifting”  in these troubled times to the United States , Great Britain , and others.

 

9/11 was a wake-up call to action. A parliamentary committee studying the needs of the CF recommended strongly (including its Liberal participants) to our government that immediate steps should be taken to revitalize the CF with a massive injection of funds and other direct support. Will this fall on deaf ears in the Cabinet? Are they willing to commit the resources needed to redress these glaring deficiencies? Or, do they seriously believe that Canada is immune to terrorism? Has the 9/11 atrocity been already forgotten in this country?

 

The peace dividend that was clawed out of the CF  through broad and deep force reductions in the early 1990s, following the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War may have been premature. Even the most cursory  review of the current international situation shows  that the world has never been a more dangerous place.

 

The strength and overall capability of the CF has been slashed even though  our troops in recent years have been committed to dangerous and demanding combat missions in the Balkans, Gulf War, Somalia, Haiti, Rwanda, Eritrea, East Timor, Kosovo and Afghanistan. In addition, large numbers of troops have been called upon to deal with serious domestic problems: i.e., Oka , the Saguenay and Winnipeg floods, the Ice Storm, Y2K.

 

The recurring theme in all of these missions is that we have a very serious shortage of ground troops; and in particular, in infantry. Let also be very  clear that without the support and participation of the militia personnel it would have been impossible to participate in all of these missions. The Army, regular and militia, is stretched to the breaking point. Equipped with inadequate resources and obsolescent  equipment, it has struggled to do much more with much less. The Infantry’s operations tempo is a demanding burden that is carried most evidently by the officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs), who not only serve in mission after mission abroad, but also spend long periods between missions deployed away from their families training new generations of soldiers, or on career courses or on other numerous tasking. In the case the militia, individual this can mean that he has to succeed in getting from his employer, a guarantee to have a job on his return or to quit or to cease his studies in order to be able to serve his country. This overall situation has not been accomplished without cost – as a group the CF has the highest divorce and suicide rates in Canada .

 

In all of these missions accomplished with enormous success, I believe that full credit and recognition has not been given to that special breed of cat who, in the end, carries the war to the enemy, wins the battles and accomplishes the majority of the missions: the Canadian Infantryman. He is the heart and muscle of our Army!  the infantryman is perhaps the most misunderstood profession in the Canadian Forces.  Popularly seen in terms of trench warfare and as mindless cannon-fodder, there is an ignorance about what the infantryman is and what he (or in a few cases, she) does.  

 

So, as Colonel Commandant of the Infantry Corps, I am going to get on my high horse and tell you who these soldiers (regular and militia) are, what they do, and why I am so proud of representing them.  I have spent my adult life in their company  (I would do it all over again -- and again).  In the course of my last 33 years, I have had the privilege of commanding troops from 33 countries on missions from Cyprus through Western Sahara to Croatia and the Ice Storm in Quebec . 

 

I say, with more conviction than I can express in print, that Canadian soldiers, and in particular Canadian Infantrymen, are the finest in the world. They have over this century won, at significant cost in lives, a world wide reputation for courage, resourcefulness, determination, adaptability, initiative, skill and success in battle,.and at whatever missions they were given. These accomplishments are made more laudable because they were/are achieved, as we all know, in the face of long-standing and increasingly severe constraints in terms of resources: manpower, equipment, public and political support.

 

Being an infantryman, at whatever rank level, is not a job.  It is an all-consuming task and challenge.  Not everyone can become one; it takes a special breed of person; the fact that they are recognized as the Queen of Battle is a true indication of their essential necessity. I repeat myself, being an infantryman is unlike any other profession; it is not just a job. It is a calling or a commitment that transcend mere employment.

When considering the unprecedented number of tanks and aircraft which seemed to dominate the battlefield, it is all too easy to overlook the immense contribution of the foot soldier. The simple fact is that without the infantryman, all the exertions of the tankers, gunners and pilots will be for nothing. Time and time again, it has been proven that a nation could be bombed to oblivion, but would not admit defeat until its citizen looked out to find foreign soldiers on their streets. Reaching these streets is the job of the infantryman and he is the only one to be able to do it.

 

Regardless of the season, the climate or the terrain, the infantryman can and will fight, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week and fifty-two weeks a year. It has been sometime since an infantry battle was called off due to adverse weather conditions. Yet those same conditions can still ground planes; mud, snow and sand can still halt tanks, guns and trucks. But at the sharp end, the infantryman is still called upon to fight alone! The frontline or the operations area is always delineated by the positions the infantry occupies.

 

Few profession calls its members to undergo the physical and mental hardships and fatigue as those required of an infantryman and their leaders.

 

Few profession has the faith to place the health and welfare of its fittest and most youthful members in the hand of its youngest and most inexperienced leaders.

 

Few profession faces its leaders with this great contradiction of leadership: That on one hand of the protection, training and nurturing of soldiers under your command; while on the other hand having to deliberately expose those same soldiers to the most lethal hazards of war to achieve military missions.

 

No other profession asks its members to perform more diverse functions, acquire different trades and tasks throughout their careers. For example they may be required to become expert in reconnaissance, pioneers, mortars, anti-armor, snipers, parachutist, driver, armored vehicle commander, mountaineer, jungle warfare, administrator, instructor, -- there is no end to the list because there is always something new to be done....

 

Few profession sees such limited financial compensation for such grueling work hours, nor  dislocation from family so frequently, nor routine endurance of such austere conditions.

 

But above all else, no other profession than the armed forces calls on its members to make the unlimited liability contract; that is the commitment to give ones life if necessary to achieve its government interest or to protect the nation. It is worth recalling that in WWII Canadian infantryman took 70% of the army’s casualties but represented less than 10% of the army’s strength. The average life expectancy of an infantry platoon commander in combat in North-West Europe was six weeks.

 

In the future the majority of wars will be fought by small units in urban area, jungle, mountain, wooded areas or deserts. (The majority of the operations where the Canadian Army has participated recently has also been on similar terrain)  The “raison d’être” of the infantryman “ to close with and destroy...” will remain if not increase. Technology may be able to improve military capabilities, but it will never replace the need for “boots on the ground.”  Indeed, the increased capability to gather and exploit intelligence and information on a global scale will increase the need for fighting forces who can act individually, with initiative and judgement, and are able to used the information locally.

However, increasing missions abroad, and unrelenting force reductions have played havoc with the structure and operational depth of our infantry (both regular and militia). The reality is that the CF as a whole, and the infantry in particular, have responded to this unending mission creep by cannibalizing units, running down training capabilities, and expending limited critical resources. All units are undermanned. More new purpose-equipped infantry units are needed now to carry the burden of international missions that have been passed to the infantry. Some incremental improvements have been made. The Army is dealing painfully and slowly with a massive turnover of personnel that is exacerbated by the introduction of complicated new equipment weapons systems like the Coyote reconnaissance vehicle and the new LAV III armored personnel carrier. These systems include complex electronics, incredible surveillance systems, and impressive fire-control systems. All of these technological advances require new skill sets that take time to establish and maintain. They all call up a broader depth of skilled manpower.

 

An excellent story was broadcast recently on CBC Newsworld describing the training that Third Battalion, The Royal Canadian Regiment (3RCR) from Petawawa (with some militia elements) had completed as a contingency in the event they were to be tasked to deploy to Afghanistan to replace 3PPCLI (this did not happened).  The message in the broadcast was that 3RCR did not relish the thought of going to war but they will respond if so ordered, with confidence and competence.  But equally clear was the concern that if they are ordered to deploy, they expect to have sufficient soldiers; adequate equipment, appropriate training and the full support of all Canadians, and especially our government – the politicians who sent them there to fight for our security. If they need help in setting a priority, the commanding officer of 3RCR summed it up for CBC Newsworld in two sentences:  “The answer is dead simple.  We need more people, full stop.”

 

We have the history, we have the core professionalism, we even have (for the most part) the equipment), what we are missing is the mass – the numbers of people to make the team function.

 

Canada is at war. The 9/11 attack in New York was the first shot fired in anger on our home shores. This war and its terrorism has great potential to spill over into Canada. We are not neutral. The possibility of nuclear and biological attacks against Canadian cities and institutions is a clear and present danger. While we should be hoping for the best we should be preparing for the worst. This includes an urgent fundamental review by our government to identify and then to redress the operational deficiencies of our Armed Forces, including the inadequate strength and depth of our Infantry – the Branch that will continue to be tasked to perform most of the ground-based operational missions at home and abroad.

 

(Major General Alain Forand was awarded the Star of Courage while serving with the Canadian Airborne Regiment during the war in Cyprus in 1974; and the Meritorious Service Cross for his leadership displayed while commanding UN Sector South during the Croatian army’s blitzkrieg of the Serbian Krajina in 1995; he was also the commander of all army troops deployed in Quebec during the 1998 Ice Storm).

 

 

 


 

 

Web Site Design by LCol (Retd) Rick Goebel, Calg Highrs and Capt Mike O'Leary, RCR

Email the Webmaster at postmaster at ducimus.com

1 Jun 08